Activity-based costing
Almost every company allocates its indirect costs in proportion to sales. It is convenient and it is false: the product that sells most is not the one that consumes most resources, which is why the margin the accounts show is rarely the real margin.
DB Consultants Group carries out activity-based costing studies for companies in Panama that need to know which product, which service and which customer actually make money.
The problem
Traditional costing allocates indirect costs using a single base — sales, labour hours, units — and assumes every product consumes the structure in the same proportion.
In practice it does not. A low-volume product can absorb twice the dispatch time, purchasing effort and after-sales attention of another that invoices five times as much. Activity-based costing asks first which activities each product, service or customer consumes, and only then allocates the cost.
The result tends to be uncomfortable: there is almost always a line the company believed was profitable and is not, and another one carrying the rest without anyone knowing.
What it reveals
Which one really leaves a margin, with the structure allocated according to what each consumes, and which one survives only because another subsidises it.
The large customer who demands partial deliveries, special terms and constant attention can cost more than they contribute.
What it costs to serve a channel, a region or a type of order. It is what allows minimum order sizes and dispatch policies to be set on evidence.
What share of the structure is not being used. That cost belongs to no product, and loading it onto one distorts every pricing decision.

The process
Four to eight weeks, depending on the number of lines and the quality of the operating records. The firm carries out activity-based costing studies on a recurring basis; see the note on the annual portfolio analysis for a Panamanian pharmaceutical laboratory (in Spanish).
Deliverables
Warnings
Common questions
It is a method that allocates indirect costs according to the activities each product, service or customer actually consumes, instead of spreading them with a single base such as sales or units produced.
Yes, and it often contributes more than in a manufacturer: in services almost all cost is indirect, so traditional allocation distorts the margin even further.
Four to eight weeks, depending on the number of product lines and the quality of the operating records.
No. The study is built in parallel, drawing data from the accounts and from the operation. If the company later wants to build it into the system, the map is already done.
Financial statements, detail of expenses by area, volumes by product and by customer, and operating data: orders, deliveries, SKUs, visits.
Yes. The study is built in parallel to the accounts, so it can be presented alongside the group’s cost structure, with the differences in allocation criteria set out explicitly rather than buried in the numbers.
Yes, and that is where the value is. The model is delivered open so the company can update it and compare against the previous period.
Yes. The nature of every engagement is confidential and is not disclosed without the client’s written authorisation.
A first conversation is enough to establish what operating data exists and estimate the scope. It is confidential and commits you to nothing.